1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1995 Opel Tigra
To start off, 1995 Opel Tigra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1995 Opel Tigra. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1995 Opel Tigra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1141 kg more than 1995 Opel Tigra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Opel Tigra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Sixty | 1995 Opel Tigra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | Sixty | Tigra |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 3930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2430 mm |
