1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (582 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 354 more horse power than 1970 Cadillac Sixty. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1970 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 146 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Sixty | 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sixty | ML |
Year Released | 1970 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 7253 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 582 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 2050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2520 mm |