1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 96 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Sixty | 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sixty | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2650 mm |
