1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (207 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 221 kg more than 2004 Volvo XC90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Sixty | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Sixty | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 1975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2860 mm |
