1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Because 1970 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Sixty | Epica |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4805 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2700 mm |