1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. (221 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 634 kg more than 1970 Cadillac Sixty.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Sixty | 2009 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Sixty | E |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2987 cc |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 221 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 2830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2860 mm |
