1970 Chevrolet C-10 vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. In terms of performance, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 (250 HP) has 178 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet C-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Chevrolet C-10 | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | C-10 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 72 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
