1970 Chevrolet C-10 vs. 1996 Honda S-MX
To start off, 1996 Honda S-MX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet C-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet C-10 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 (250 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1996 Honda S-MX. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda S-MX.
Because 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet C-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda S-MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chevrolet C-10 | 1996 Honda S-MX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | C-10 | S-MX |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 129 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |