1970 Chevrolet C-10 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet C-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet C-10 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 (250 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2003 Volvo C70. (160 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo C70.
Because 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet C-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Chevrolet C-10 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | C-10 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 160 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
