1970 Chevrolet C-10 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet C-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet C-10 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1970 Chevrolet C-10. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1970 Chevrolet C-10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1970 Chevrolet C-10 has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1970 Chevrolet C-10 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Chevrolet C-10 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | C-10 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 435 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
