1970 Chevrolet C-10 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet C-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet C-10 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (276 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1970 Chevrolet C-10. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1970 Chevrolet C-10.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Chevrolet C-10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1970 Chevrolet C-10 has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1970 Chevrolet C-10 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chevrolet C-10 | 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | C-10 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 276 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |