1970 Chevrolet C-10 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet C-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet C-10 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 (250 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet C-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chevrolet C-10 | 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | C-10 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 97 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |