1970 Chevrolet C-10 vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet C-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet C-10 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 (250 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2013 Volvo X670. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo X670.
Because 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet C-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chevrolet C-10 | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | C-10 | X670 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 237 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |