1970 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2003 Ford Puma
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2003 Ford Puma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Chevelle | Puma |
Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4996 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2450 mm |