1970 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 7,442 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 705 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1970 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Monte Carlo | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7442 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2350 mm |