1970 Chevrolet Nova vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 300 kg more than 1970 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 1970 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Chevrolet Nova | 1999 Acura CL | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
| Model | Nova | CL |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2715 mm |
