1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 535 kg more than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Chrysler 160 | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | 160 | Sentia |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2952 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2860 mm |
