1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 511 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (728 Nm) has 603 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Chrysler 160 | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 590 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 728 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |
