1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 1998 Holden Nova
To start off, 1998 Holden Nova is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Because 1970 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Holden Nova (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chrysler 160 | 1998 Holden Nova | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 160 | Nova |
Year Released | 1970 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |