1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 2001 Ford 49
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford 49 (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford 49 should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford 49 weights approximately 233 kg more than 1970 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford 49 (175 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2001 Ford 49 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Chrysler 160 | 2001 Ford 49 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | 49 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |
