1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 2002 Saturn SC

To start off, 2002 Saturn SC is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Saturn SC (101 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Saturn SC should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Saturn SC weights approximately 9 kg more than 1970 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Saturn SC (155 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Saturn SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: