1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1970 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chrysler 160 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Chrysler | MCC |
Model | 160 | Smart |
Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |