1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 2004 Honda Civic

To start off, 2004 Honda Civic is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,668 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Civic (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda Civic weights approximately 89 kg more than 1970 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Honda Civic (149 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2004 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: