1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Citroen C2
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Chrysler 160 (79 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C2 (150 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2006 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chrysler 160 | 2006 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | 160 | C2 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1398 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |