1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | 160 | LR3 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 316 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |