1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Mercury Mariner

To start off, 2010 Mercury Mariner is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercury Mariner (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 450 kg more than 1970 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercury Mariner (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: