1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Chrysler 160 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | 160 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
