1970 Chrysler 300 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1970 Chrysler 300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 7,209 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Chrysler 300 (370 HP) has 344 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Chrysler 300 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chrysler | DAF |
| Model | 300 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7209 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 370 HP | 26 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2060 mm |
