1970 Chrysler 300 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 7,209 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Chrysler 300 (370 HP) has 300 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Chrysler 300 (651 Nm) has 549 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1970 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 1970 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1970 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: