1970 Chrysler Centura vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler Centura. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler Centura would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler Centura is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Chrysler Centura (164 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2005 Volvo V50. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chrysler Centura should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo V50.
Because 1970 Chrysler Centura is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler Centura. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Chrysler Centura (318 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volvo V50. (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1970 Chrysler Centura will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volvo V50.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chrysler Centura | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Centura | V50 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |