1970 Chrysler Centura vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler Centura. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler Centura would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler Centura. (118 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler Centura.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Chrysler Centura. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler Centura. (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler Centura.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chrysler Centura | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Centura | Ranger |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1980 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2840 mm |