1970 Chrysler Centura vs. 2009 Volvo S60
To start off, 2009 Volvo S60 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler Centura. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler Centura would be higher. At 3,533 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler Centura is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S60 (258 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler Centura. (139 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler Centura.
Because 1970 Chrysler Centura is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler Centura. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S60 (350 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler Centura. (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler Centura.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chrysler Centura | 2009 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Centura | S60 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3533 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 258 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |