1970 Chrysler Newport vs. 2000 Mercury Villager

To start off, 2000 Mercury Villager is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler Newport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler Newport would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler Newport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Chrysler Newport (173 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Mercury Villager. (168 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chrysler Newport should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Chrysler Newport weights approximately 130 kg more than 2000 Mercury Villager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Chrysler Newport is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler Newport. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Chrysler Newport (388 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Villager. (271 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1970 Chrysler Newport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Villager.

Compare all specifications: