1970 Citroen Ami vs. 1962 Zastava 750
To start off, 1970 Citroen Ami is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 766 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Zastava 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Citroen Ami (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Citroen Ami should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Citroen Ami weights approximately 15 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Citroen Ami | 1962 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | Ami | 750 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 766 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 605 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2010 mm |
