1970 Citroen Ami vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 602 cc (2 cylinders), 1970 Citroen Ami is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1970 Citroen Ami. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1970 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 124 kg more than 1970 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Citroen Ami | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Citroen | MCC |
| Model | Ami | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1810 mm |
