1970 Dodge Challenger vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1980 Mazda 323 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 541 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Dodge Challenger | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Challenger | 323 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2320 mm |