1970 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Dodge Challenger (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 435 kg more than 1970 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Dodge Challenger. (233 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Challenger | SSU |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2570 mm |
