1970 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1970 Dodge Challenger. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 1970 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota F-1 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1970 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Dodge Challenger. (233 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Dodge Challenger | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Challenger | F-1 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1610 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2710 mm |
