1970 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Dodge Challenger (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1970 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Dodge Challenger (233 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1970 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Dodge | Kia |
Model | Challenger | K2700 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2390 mm |