1970 Dodge Challenger vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1970 Dodge Challenger. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1970 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Dodge Challenger. (233 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Dodge Challenger | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Challenger | Commodore |
Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 233 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |