1970 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1970 Fiat Campagnola is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1970 Fiat Campagnola. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1970 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 356 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.

Because 1970 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Fiat Campagnola. (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Fiat Campagnola.

Compare all specifications:

1970 Fiat Campagnola 1968 Mazda Cosmo
Make Fiat Mazda
Model Campagnola Cosmo
Year Released 1970 1968
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1901 cc 1964 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 60 HP 94 HP
Torque 128 Nm 133 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1296 kg 940 kg
Vehicle Length 3650 mm 4150 mm
Vehicle Width 1580 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1950 mm 1170 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2210 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 38 L 57 L