1970 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sedona (195 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1970 Ford 12 M. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford 12 M.
Because 1970 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Sedona (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Ford 12 M. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford 12 M | 2006 Kia Sedona | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | 12 M | Sedona |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1305 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2920 mm |