1970 Ford 17 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1970 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford 17.
Because 1970 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Ford 17. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford 17 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 17 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1970 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 50 L |