1970 Ford Corsair vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1970 Ford Corsair. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Corsair.
Because 1970 Ford Corsair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Corsair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford Corsair | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Corsair | TL |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2840 mm |