1970 Ford Falcon vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1970 Ford Falcon is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (129 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 390 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (259 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford Falcon | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Falcon | FX |
Year Released | 1970 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 259 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |