1970 Ford Falcon vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1970 Ford Falcon. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Falcon.
Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (259 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Ford Falcon | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Falcon | FTO |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 259 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
