1970 Ford Falcon vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 1999 Seat Cordoba is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1999 Seat Cordoba. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1999 Seat Cordoba.
Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Ford Falcon. (259 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Ford Falcon | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Falcon | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 259 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2520 mm |
