1970 Ford Falcon vs. 2001 Mazda 626
To start off, 2001 Mazda 626 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 120 kg more than 2001 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (326 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 626. (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford Falcon | 2001 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | 626 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |