1970 Ford Falcon vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (217 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (408 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: