1970 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1970 Ford Falcon. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 83 kg more than 1970 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (259 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (207 Nm). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford Falcon | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | Tribute |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 259 Nm | 207 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1443 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |